Smell-O-Vision: The Curious Case of Cinema’s Forgotten Sense

By Kate Holtz — Staff writer for Massive Action Media covering entertainment news, including music, film, and celebrity lifestyles.

In the endless quest to make movies more immersive, filmmakers have experimented with everything from widescreen formats to vibrating seats. But perhaps no attempt was more bizarre—or more ambitious—than Smell-O-Vision, an invention that aimed to tickle the audience's noses while dazzling their eyes and ears. While short-lived, it remains one of the most peculiar chapters in film history.

The idea of combining scent with motion pictures dates back to the early 20th century. As early as 1906, theaters experimented with releasing rose oil into the air to accompany romantic scenes. By the 1920s, the concept was being seriously discussed, though the technology wasn’t yet up to the task. That changed in the late 1950s, when Swiss-born inventor Hans Laube finally developed a system that could synchronize specific smells with precise moments in a film.

Laube's invention, dubbed Smell-O-Vision, worked by piping scents through small tubes connected to each seat in the theater. The release of aromas was controlled by a soundtrack-activated mechanism, designed to emit the right smell at just the right time. It was meant to be seamless—viewers wouldn’t just see a loaf of bread on screen; they’d smell it too.

The one and only major film to use Smell-O-Vision was Scent of Mystery, released in 1960 and produced by Mike Todd Jr., son of legendary showman Mike Todd. Designed as a whodunit with aromatic clues woven into the plot, the film attempted to use scent as a storytelling device. Audiences were supposed to smell pipe tobacco, freshly baked bread, perfume, even wine—each tied to a character or scene.

In theory, it was revolutionary. In practice, it was a mess.

Technical difficulties plagued the premiere. Scents often arrived out of sync, appeared too faint to notice, or lingered too long—leading to odd and sometimes nauseating mixtures. Some theatergoers reported not smelling anything at all. The novelty quickly wore off as confusion replaced wonder. Critics were not kind. One reviewer called it “a stunt that stinks,” while The New York Times noted that the aromas were “more distracting than immersive.”

The failure of Smell-O-Vision wasn’t just technical—it was conceptual. Audiences found that scents didn’t enhance the narrative as much as they interrupted it. Rather than adding depth, they added clutter. Smell-O-Vision was quietly shelved after Scent of Mystery, which itself was later re-released in Cinerama under the title Holiday in Spain, minus the smells.

Still, the concept never entirely disappeared. In 1981, cult filmmaker John Waters revived the idea with Polyester, using a scratch-and-sniff card system called "Odorama." Audiences were prompted to rub specific numbered spots at key points during the film—an intentionally low-budget, campy homage to Smell-O-Vision’s failure. Waters embraced the absurdity and made the gimmick work by leaning into it.

In recent years, scent-enhanced experiences have found new life in theme parks, VR environments, and 4D cinemas. Attractions like Soarin’ Over California at Disney parks use carefully timed aromas to enhance realism, while modern VR developers have experimented with wearable scent devices to make immersive experiences more lifelike.

While Smell-O-Vision’s 1960 debut was a flop, its ambition helped pave the way for today’s multi-sensory entertainment. Hans Laube’s invention was undeniably ahead of its time, and though his dream didn’t quite stick the landing, it planted a strange and fragrant seed for future innovators.

Legacy and Restoration

Scent of Mystery was later re-released under the title Holiday in Spain without Smell-O-Vision. In 2012, the film was restored and reconstructed by David Strohmaier. In 2015, a version with recreated scents was presented at special screenings in Los Angeles, Denmark, and England—giving audiences a rare second chance to experience the most aromatic misfire in cinematic history.

---

About the Author

Kate Holtz is senior editor and staff writer for Massive Action Media. Born in Miami, Florida, she earned her bachelor's degree in journalism from Miami Dade College before relocating to Los Angeles. With over 20 years of experience, Kate covers music, film, celebrity lifestyle, action sports, and more.

Copyright/Disclaimer

View The Copyright Disclaimer here

Report Errors/Contribute to Site

Submit errors or contribute to our site here